• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Republica Press

Your Business & Political News Source

REPUBLICA PRESS
Your Business & Political News Source

  • Home
  • BUSINESS
  • MONEY
  • POLITICS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • SCIENCE/TECH
  • US
  • WORLD

Supreme Court Leak Inquiry Exposes Gray Area of Press Protections

by

“The norms of confidentiality at the court, they’re not gentle or subtle,” said Allison Orr Larsen, a professor at William and Mary Law School who clerked for Justice David H. Souter. “They are strongly and repeatedly emphasized.”

As blunt and terrifying as those warnings may be, they are informal. So are the rules that apply to the justices themselves, who have been resistant to being bound by written procedures on most matters concerning their work.

“They don’t even have written ethics rules for the justices,” said Paul M. Smith, a law professor at Georgetown University who clerked for Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. The leak, he said, and the focus on the lack of those standards after recent revelations about the political activities of Virginia Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, may put more pressure on the court to accept new restrictions on how it operates.

Other legal scholars, including some at the conservative Heritage Foundation, have pointed to a number of laws that could be used to prosecute the leaker and spur the kind of wide-ranging investigation that could entangle the press, court staff and even individual justices. One law that has been used against leakers, according to John Malcolm, a legal expert with the Heritage Foundation, broadly deals with theft, embezzlement and the conversion of “things of value” that belong to the government.

None are slam dunks. But First Amendment experts said they would not be surprised if one of these laws was tested in this case.

RonNell Andersen Jones, a professor at the University of Utah’s S.J. Quinney College of Law who clerked for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, said that when she and a group of former clerks who text one another heard of the Politico article, their immediate reaction was that it had to be a hoax. A leak of this magnitude, they all understood, is strictly forbidden.

“What it means to be strictly forbidden is about to be tested,” Ms. Andersen Jones added.

View Source

>>> Don’t Miss Today’s BEST Amazon Deals! <<<<

Filed Under: BUSINESS Tagged With: article, Clarence Thomas, Classified Information and State Secrets, Embezzlement, Ethics, First Amendment (US Constitution), Focus, Freedom of the Press, Government, Heritage, Law, News and News Media, News Sources, Confidential Status of, Politico, The, Roberts, John G Jr, Supreme Court (US), Virginia

Primary Sidebar

More to See

Cathay Bank Celebrates Its 60th Anniversary

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--This year marks Cathay Bank’s 60th Anniversary. Founded in 1962 in Los Angeles Chinatown, the bank’s initial focus was … [Read More...] about Cathay Bank Celebrates Its 60th Anniversary

In Los Angeles, a Tree With Stories to Tell

In fact, it was after Mr. Johnson won the high jump that Hitler left the stadium in Berlin, before Mr. Johnson received his medal, even though earlier … [Read More...] about In Los Angeles, a Tree With Stories to Tell

Very Rare Frank Lloyd Wright Home in Virginia Available for $2.85M

Listed for $2,975,000 at the beginning of the month, this architectural delight in Virginia Beach had its price trimmed by $125,000 last week. Located … [Read More...] about Very Rare Frank Lloyd Wright Home in Virginia Available for $2.85M

Copyright © 2022 · Republica Press · Log in · As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy