There is no clear blueprint for corporate engagement on abortion. After numerous companies came forward to announce that they would cover travel expenses for their employees to get abortions, executives have had to move swiftly to both sort out the mechanics of those policies and explain them to a work force concerned about confidentiality and safety.
Few companies have commented directly on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which ended nearly 50 years of federal abortion rights. Far more have responded by expanding their health care policies to cover travel and other expenses for employees who can’t get abortions close to home, now that the procedure is banned in at least eight states with other bans set to soon take effect. About half the country gets its health care coverage from employers, and the wave of new employer commitments has raised concerns from some workers about privacy.
“It’s a doomsday scenario if individuals have to bring their health care choices to their employers,” said Dina Fierro, a global vice president at the cosmetics company Nars, echoing a concern that many workers have expressed on social media in recent days.
Popular Information. Match Group declined to comment.
tweet: “I believe CEOs have a responsibility to take care of their employees — no matter what.”
June 29 (Reuters) – A growing number of companies, including JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O), Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) and Walt Disney Co (DIS.N) are updating or changing their health insurance policies to offer travel benefits to U.S. employees who may need to access out of state abortion services.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday took the dramatic step of overturning the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that recognized a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion and legalized it nationwide. read more
Below is a list of companies that have said they will cover or reimburse U.S. employees who need to travel to receive medical care, including abortion, if access where workers live is restricted.
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
Register
Airbnb Inc (ABNB.O)
Alaska Air Group Inc (ALK.N) read more
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O)
Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) read more
American Express Co (AXP.N)
Apollo Global Management Inc (APO.N) read more
Apple Inc (AAPL.O)
AT&T Inc (T.N)
Bank of America Corp (BAC.N)
Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO)
Blackstone Inc (BX.N) read more
Block Inc (SQ.N)
Bumble Inc (BMBL.O) read more
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO)
Carlyle Group Inc (CG.O) read more
Chobani
Citigroup Inc (C.N) read more
CVS Health Corp (CVS.N)
Deutsche Bank AG read more
Dick’s Sporting Goods (DKS.N) read more
DoorDash Inc (DASH.N)
Equinox
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) read more
Gucci (PRTP.PA)
H&M (HMb.ST)
HubSpot Inc
Intel Corp (INTC.O)
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) read more
JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) read more
Kroger Co (KR.N)
Levi Strauss & Co (LEVI.N) read more
L’Oreal (OREP.PA)
LVMH (LVMH.PA)
Lyft Inc (LYFT.O) read more
Macy’s Inc (M.N)
Mastercard Inc (MA.N) read more
Meta Platforms Inc (META.O) read more
Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) read more
Morgan Stanley (MS.N) read more
Netflix Inc (NFLX.O)
Nordstrom Inc (JWN.N)
OKCupid (MTCH.O) read more
PayPal Holdings Inc (PYPL.O)
Pinterest Inc (PINS.N)
Proctor and Gamble Co(PG.N)
Ralph Lauren Corp (RL.N)
Rivian Automotive Inc(RIVN.O)
Starbucks Corp (SBUX.O) read more
Target Corp (TGT.N)
Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) read more
TPG Inc (TPG.O) read more
Uber Technologies Inc (UBER.N)
Ulta Beauty Inc (ULTA.O)
Unilever PLC (ULVR.L)
United Talent Agency read more
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc (WBA.O)
Walt Disney Co (DIS.N) read more
Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N) read more
Yahoo
Yelp Inc (YELP.N) read more
Zillow Group Inc (ZG.O)
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
Register
Reporting by Doyinsola Oladipo and Akash Sriram; Additional reporting by Chavi Mehta, Manas Mishra and Nichola Saminather; Editing by Anna Driver, Rosalba O’Brien, Bill Berkrot, Daniel Wallis, William Maclean
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Even more recently, corporate leaders were reminded of how fraught engagement can be. Disney, for example, faced internal backlash when its leadership declined to take a strong stance against Florida’s Parental Rights in Education act, which critics often refer to as the “Don’t Say Gay” law. But when the chief executive did take a public stance, the company was crucified on social media, and the state revoked its special tax benefits.
From Opinion: A Challenge to Roe v. Wade
Commentary by Times Opinion writers and columnists on the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Now, with the expected demise of the country’s landmark abortion law, corporate leaders are confronting the hottest of hot-button issues. In a Pew Research poll in 2021, 59 percent of Americans said they believed that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 39 percent said it should be illegal in all or most cases. People on all sides of the issue feel strongly about it, with nearly a quarter of Americans saying they will vote only for candidates who share their views on abortion, according to Gallup.
That all adds up to many reasons a company would want to avoid making any statement on abortion — and all the more reason that customers and workers could come to see it as necessary. A company’s position on the end of Roe could have repercussions for how it hires in an increasingly competitive labor market, and how customers view its brand.
“Abortion is a health care issue, health care is an employer issue, so abortion is an issue for employers,” said Carolyn Witte, chief executive of Tia, a women’s health care company. On Tuesday, Tia announced that it would provide medication abortions through its telemedicine platform in states where it operated and where doing so was legal.
For some major companies that have been known to weigh in on political and social issues, this week has been unusually quiet. Walmart, Disney, Meta, PwC, Salesforce, JPMorgan Chase, ThirdLove, Patagonia, Kroger and Business Roundtable were among the companies and organizations that declined to comment or take a position, or did not respond to requests for comment about whether they plan to make public statements about their stance on abortion. Hobby Lobby, which in 2014 brought a suit to the Supreme Court challenging whether employer-provided health care had to include contraception, made no public statement and did not respond to a request for comment.
Other companies did wade in. United Talent Agency said it would reimburse travel expenses for employees affected by abortion bans. Airbnb said it would ensure its employees “have the resources they need to make choices about their reproductive rights.” Levi Strauss & Company, which has said its benefits plan will reimburse employees who have to travel out of state for health care services such as abortions, said abortion was a business issue.