• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Republica Press

Your Business & Political News Source

REPUBLICA PRESS
Your Business & Political News Source

  • Home
  • BUSINESS
  • MONEY
  • POLITICS
  • REAL ESTATE
  • SCIENCE/TECH
  • US
  • WORLD
  • VIDEOS

Supreme Court Backs Georgia College Student’s Free Speech Suit

by

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a student in Georgia could pursue a lawsuit challenging speech restrictions at his college even though he sought only nominal damages.

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority in the 8-to-1 decision, said a request for even a token sum, typically a dollar, satisfied the Constitution’s requirement that federal courts decide only actual cases or controversies in cases. The fact that the college had withdrawn the speech code challenged in the suit, he wrote, did not make the case moot.

“Despite being small,” Justice Thomas wrote, “nominal damages are certainly concrete.”

In a spirited dissent, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the majority’s approach will have the effect of “turning judges into advice columnists.”

“If nominal damages can preserve a live controversy,” he wrote, “then federal courts will be required to give advisory opinions whenever a plaintiff tacks on a request for a dollar.”

A trial judge agreed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, affirmed her ruling.

The question for the justices was whether there is anything left to decide when the government changes a policy after being sued and the plaintiff asks for only nominal damages to acknowledge the constitutional violation.

When the case was argued in January, several members of the court referred to what Justice Elena Kagan called “the most famous nominal damages case I know of in recent times, which is the Taylor Swift sexual assault case.”

Ms. Swift, the pop superstar, sued a Denver radio host she said had groped her. She sought $1 in nominal damages.

“I’m not really interested in your money,” Justice Kagan said, describing Ms. Swift’s thinking. “I just want a dollar, and that dollar is going to represent something both to me and to the world of women who have experienced what I’ve experienced.”

Justice Thomas, writing for the majority on Monday, instead relied on English common law to explain the role nominal damages play in the judicial system.

“By permitting plaintiffs to pursue nominal damages whenever they suffered a personal legal injury,” he wrote, “the common law avoided the oddity of privileging small-dollar economic rights over important, but not easily quantifiable, nonpecuniary rights.”

It would be odd, he wrote, if the student could sue for “a wasted bus fare to travel to the free speech zone” but not for nominal damages.

In dissent, Chief Justice Roberts wrote that the majority’s approach represented “a radical expansion of the judicial power.”

“Until now,” he wrote, “we have said that federal courts can review the legality of policies and actions only as a necessary incident to resolving real disputes. Going forward, the judiciary will be required to perform this function whenever a plaintiff asks for a dollar. For those who want to know if their rights have been violated, the least dangerous branch will become the least expensive source of legal advice.”

Chief Justice Roberts proposed a partial solution to the problem he had identified.

“The best that can be said for the court’s sweeping exception to the case-or-controversy requirement,” he wrote, “is that it may itself admit of a sweeping exception: Where a plaintiff asks only for a dollar, the defendant should be able to end the case by giving him a dollar, without the court needing to pass on the merits of the plaintiff’s claims.”

View Source

Filed Under: US

Primary Sidebar

More to See

Intelli Smart Homes Makes the Prestigious Inc. 5000 2022 Ranking

MIAMI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Intelli Smart Homes, the leading smart home technology company, has been recognized as one of America’s fastest-growing … [Read More...] about Intelli Smart Homes Makes the Prestigious Inc. 5000 2022 Ranking

Walmart expands abortion coverage for its employees in the wake of Roe v Wade decision

Customers outside a Walmart store in Torrance, California, US, on Sunday, May 15, 2022. Walmart Inc. is scheduled to release earnings figures on May … [Read More...] about Walmart expands abortion coverage for its employees in the wake of Roe v Wade decision

America’s Hottest ZIP Codes of 2022 Reveal a Surprising Shift in Where People Want To Live

The past few years have been brutal on homebuyers' budgets. Would-be buyers have been priced out of some of the most desirable neighborhoods thanks to … [Read More...] about America’s Hottest ZIP Codes of 2022 Reveal a Surprising Shift in Where People Want To Live

Copyright © 2022 · Republica Press · Log in · As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy